30-minute technical screen

Evaluate the editor with your content—not our claims.

Use the same checklist for RichTextEditor, TinyMCE, CKEditor, Froala, Tiptap, or an open-source framework. Record pass, concern, owner, and evidence for every item before price decides the shortlist.

Check 1

Authoring quality

Paste your real Word and Google Docs samples. Check headings, lists, tables, links, images, whitespace, undo, and the saved HTML—not only the toolbar demo.

Check 2

Your framework

Install the package in your production framework and build pipeline. Verify loading, form binding, route changes, SSR boundaries, CSP requirements, and bundle caching.

Check 3

Customization

Recreate one real toolbar, command, dialog, upload flow, and content rule. Confirm the public API covers the workflow without editing vendor source.

Check 4

Accessibility

Complete keyboard-only authoring, inspect labels and focus order with your preferred screen reader, test zoom and mobile widths, and review the current accessibility evidence.

Check 5

AI and data flow

Connect a non-production resolver, inspect every outbound request, test preview and rejection paths, and document provider retention, region, logging, and failure behavior.

Check 6

Collaboration and review

Test simultaneous edits, reconnects, presence, comments, tracked changes, permissions, revision recovery, and provider persistence with realistic latency.

Check 7

Files and export

Exercise upload limits, type validation, storage authorization, cleanup, and your required HTML, Markdown, JSON, or DOCX round trips using representative documents.

Check 8

Operations and cost

Review health checks, rate limits, audit hooks, upgrade ownership, support terms, license scope, required add-ons, and a three-year cost scenario using your actual seats and traffic.

A useful result is evidence, including a “no.”

Keep screenshots, saved output, build logs, network traces, and unresolved requirements. RichTextEditor is strongest when perpetual self-hosting, broad framework support, and included authoring workflows matter; teams requiring a published third-party VPAT should treat that as an open requirement.